From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Attorney General Opinion No

Attorney General of Kansas — Opinion
Mar 29, 2010
2010-9 (Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen. Mar. 29, 2010)

Opinion

March 29, 2010.

Re: Arbitration and Award — Dispute Resolution — Confidentiality of Proceedings; Whether Applicable to Non-Court Ordered Mediation Procedure, Civil — Rules of Evidence — Dispute Resolution; Confidentiality; Whether Applicable to Non-Court Ordered Mediation

Synopsis: Information transmitted between the parties and a mediator during a mediation involving a dispute is confidential provided the mediation is conducted pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Act. The confidentiality provision, as well as the evidentiary privileges, found in the Act and the Rules of Evidence are not limited to disputes referred by a court. Cited herein: K.S.A. 5-501, 5-502; 5-512; K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 60-452a.

* * *


Howard Schwartz, Judicial Administrator Office of Judicial Administration Kansas Judicial Center 301 SW 10th Street Topeka, Kansas 66612

Dear Mr. Schwartz:

As Judicial Administrator you request an opinion regarding the following question of law:

Are all mediations in Kansas covered by state confidentiality statutes, regardless of whether the mediations are court-ordered or whether the mediations occur prior to filing of a case in court?

Confidentiality

The answer to your question is found by examining several statutes within the Dispute Resolution Act, beginning with the confidentiality provision that states:

K.S.A. 5-501 et seq.

All verbal or written information between any party to a dispute and a neutral person conducting a proceeding under the dispute resolution act or the staff of an approved program shall be confidential communications.

A dispute resolution proceeding is "a process by which the parties involved in a dispute voluntarily agree or are referred or ordered by a court to enter into discussion and negotiation with the assistance of a neutral person." Mediation is clearly a type of dispute resolution proceeding. Therefore, the Act will apply to the following programs, individuals and disputes:

K.S.A. 5-502(e) (emphasis added).

"Mediation" means the intervention into a dispute by a third party who has no decision making authority, is impartial to the issues being discussed, assists the parties in defining the issues in dispute, facilitates communication between the parties and assists the parties in reaching resolution. K.S.A. 5-502(f).

[R]egistered and approved programs and individuals, and personnel thereof, . . . parties to dispute resolution being conducted by registered programs and individuals, and . . . disputes referred by a court, by state government or as otherwise provided by statute. . . .

K.S.A. 5-501(b) (emphasis added).

Clearly, the Act does not limit its confidentiality provision to court referred mediations, but rather includes any mediation conducted by a registered program or registered individual. Additionally, the term "neutral person" as used in the Act's confidentiality provision refers to an "impartial third party who intervenes in a dispute at the request of the parties or the court in order to help facilitate settlement or resolution of a dispute."

This refers to those programs and individuals who have registered with the director of dispute resolution and are eligible for public funding or are otherwise approved by the director. K.S.A. 5-502(a).

K.S.A. 5-502(m) (emphasis added).

Evidentiary Privilege

While your question was framed in terms of "confidentiality," this analysis would be remiss in not mentioning the companion evidentiary privileges found in the Act, and the Rules of Evidence. With only minor differences between these sections, both privileges prevent discovery or admission of representations or statements made in a mediation.

K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 60-452a.

Both privileges refer to a dispute resolution proceeding conducted by a neutral person or staff of an approved program pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Act. Although "neutral person" is not defined in the Rules of Evidence it is defined in the Act as a "neutral impartial third party who intervenes in a dispute at the request of the parties or the court in order to help facilitate settlement or resolution of a dispute. Clearly, these evidentiary privileges extend to mediations that occur prior to the filing of a case in court provided the mediation occurs at the request of the parties and is conducted pursuant to the Dispute Resolution Act.

K.S.A. 5-501 et seq.

K.S.A. 5-502(m). (emphasis added).

Sincerely,

Steve Six Attorney General

Camille Nohe Assistant Attorney General

SS:MF:CN:jm


Summaries of

Attorney General Opinion No

Attorney General of Kansas — Opinion
Mar 29, 2010
2010-9 (Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen. Mar. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Attorney General Opinion No

Case Details

Full title:Howard Schwartz

Court:Attorney General of Kansas — Opinion

Date published: Mar 29, 2010

Citations

2010-9 (Ops.Kan.Atty.Gen. Mar. 29, 2010)